A permit to dig is required whenever excavation carries a credible risk of striking buried services or causing ground collapse. That risk, not a fixed depth, is the trigger. Under CDM 2015, excavations demand competent inspection, and HSE HSG47 sets the safe digging expectations behind that permit. If you’re unsure whether the ground you’re breaking qualifies, stop and arrange a survey before starting excavation.
TL;DR:
- A permit to dig is necessary when there is a credible risk of hitting buried services or causing ground collapse, regardless of excavation depth.
- It must include detailed information such as precise location, depth, method, utility references, and verification evidence like CAT scans and trial holes.
- Pre-start checks involve obtaining up-to-date utility drawings, conducting scans, confirming with trial holes, and coordinating with service owners for written agreements.
- Ongoing inspection at every shift, after stability changes, and following material falls is mandatory to maintain permit validity and safety.
- Common failures include relying on outdated drawings, broad permits, neglecting reissuance during progress, and skipping verification steps, which increase incident risk.
A permit to dig is a site specific document that records where buried services have been located, what controls are in place, and who has authorised the work to proceed. It’s the paperwork that turns “we think it’s safe” into “we’ve proven it’s safe” — and it’s the first thing an HSE inspector will ask to see after an incident.
You need one for more jobs than most site managers assume. PermitPad’s guidance treats the permit as necessary whenever there’s a credible chance of hitting services or triggering a collapse, regardless of depth. That covers:
A shallow garden trench in genuinely virgin ground with no service history might not need one. Anything near a road, a building, or an area with any recorded utility presence does.
Three separate regimes govern excavation, and mixing them up is where contractors get caught out. CDM 2015 Regulation 22 requires “all practicable steps” to prevent collapse and mandates inspection by a competent person at the start of every shift, after any event likely to affect stability, and after any unintended fall of material. Excavation collapse still contributes to roughly five deaths and hundreds of serious injuries annually in UK construction, which is why this duty carries real weight rather than being a box-ticking formality.
Statistic to remember: HSG47 restricts mechanical excavation to within 500mm of any detected service, beyond which you must switch to hand digging or vacuum excavation.
The safe digging hierarchy that underpins any credible permit runs:
Where work touches the public highway, you need a separate street works licence under NRSWA, which carries its own notice periods and conditions. Some local authorities also publish permit guidance for works affecting the highway from private land. Building Regulations add another layer: certain groundworks need advance notice to the local authority before excavations or drains are covered over, under regulation 16 of the Building Regulations 2010.
A permit is only as good as the verification behind it. Skip the checks and you’ve written a piece of paper that won’t hold up under scrutiny, let alone protect your team. Work through these steps in order before anyone signs off:
Pro Tip: Never let a trial hole finding contradict the drawing without escalating it. If the pit shows a service 400mm off the drawn position, treat the whole drawing as unreliable until the owner confirms otherwise.
Our utility trenching guidance for Cambridge walks through this verification sequence in more depth if you’re setting up the process for the first time.
A permit that doesn’t specify exactly where and how deep the dig goes is barely worth issuing. Industry templates build in fields for buried services checks, shoring requirements, atmospheric testing, emergency rescue arrangements, and a daily inspection log to satisfy CDM 2015.
The permit needs to capture:
| Field category | What it must record |
|---|---|
| Authorisation | Competent person signature, responsible supervisor, permit validity dates |
| Revision control | Version number and reason for any reissue as the dig advances |
| Close-out | Daily inspection sign-offs, completion confirmation, record retention period |
Validity matters as much as content. A permit issued for one working area shouldn’t silently cover a different face further along the trench. It needs reissuing or formal amendment as the dig progresses, so the CAT results and trial holes on file actually match the ground being worked.
Issuing the permit is the easy part. Keeping it valid through the working day is where discipline slips. CDM 2015 Schedule 2 inspection timing applies here directly: a competent person checks the excavation at the start of every shift, after anything that might affect stability (heavy rain, nearby vibration, a change in load), and after any fall of material.
Pro Tip: As a rough guide, excavations under 1.2 metres in stable ground may not need formal shoring, 1.2 to 2 metres calls for a proper assessment, and beyond 2 metres you’re almost always into engineered support territory. Soil type and water table override the numbers every time.
Our excavation safety guidance and deep excavation checklist both expand on shoring decisions and inspection records if you’re building this into a site procedure.

Most excavation incidents trace back to a handful of repeatable failures, not exotic bad luck. Recognise these patterns and you’ll catch the mistake before it becomes an incident report.
Every one of these is an administrative shortcut that feels harmless until a machine bucket meets a gas main. Digital permit systems are closing this gap by making it easier to attach CAT photos, timestamp inspections, and flag when a permit needs reissuing rather than quietly extending.
On a recent Cambridge groundworks package, our supervisors ran the desktop review first: utility drawings pulled and dated, then a full CAT and Genny sweep of the trench line before any plant arrived. Trial holes at three points confirmed a gas service sat 300mm off the drawn position, which triggered a written safe working agreement with the utility owner before digging resumed.
What made the permit auditable wasn’t the paperwork alone. It was the evidence attached to it:
Our site preparation guide covers how this fits into the broader pre-start sequence for compliant UK projects.
I’ve seen enough groundworks packages to know that permits rarely fail because teams don’t understand the rules. They fail because someone decided the drawing was “close enough.” Good permitting isn’t paperwork for its own sake. It cuts programme delays, avoids the claims that follow a service strike, and protects a contractor’s reputation with the client long after the trench is backfilled. If your team needs support building that discipline into daily practice, GCS Contractors can help.
— George
Gcscontractors gives you what a generic checklist can’t: supervisors who have actually issued and closed out excavation permits on live Cambridge and East Anglia sites, working alongside utility owners rather than around them.

We support permitted digs with competent supervisors trained against CDM 2015 Regulation 22, ready-built permit templates covering CAT/Genny evidence and trial hole records, and direct liaison with service owners where drawings need clarifying. Whether you’re planning trenching, foundations, or roadworks, we handle the pre-start surveys and daily inspection regime so your programme doesn’t stall waiting on paperwork. For deeper groundworks, our groundworks and foundation services in Cambridge page covers the full scope. If a specialist earthing or drilling issue turns up mid-dig, Indelec’s deep earth grounding services are worth knowing about too. Get in touch for a quote on your next excavation package and we’ll talk through what permitting support your site actually needs.